2
Step 2: This hypotenuse is the shorter leg of the larger 30-60-90 triangle, so y=2×2=4? No, wait, the larger triangle has angle 30°, so the side opposite 30° is 2, so hypotenuse y=4? No, wait, the figure shows the 60° triangle has leg √3, so x=1, then the side adjacent to 30° is x=1? No, correct steps: 30-60-90 triangle with leg √3 (opposite 60°), so shorter leg x=√3/√3=1. Then the hypotenuse of this small triangle is 2, which is the shorter leg of the larger 30-60-90 triangle. So z (opposite 60°)=2×√3=2√3? No, wait, no, the figure has a 60° angle, leg √3, so x=1, then the larger triangle has angle 30°, so side y is hypotenuse=2×2=4? No, I think I messed up. Wait, correct: 30-60-90 triangle, side opposite 60° is √3, so side opposite 30° is 1 (x=1), hypotenuse is 2. Then this hypotenuse is the side opposite 30° in the larger triangle, so hypotenuse y=4, side z (opposite 60°)=2×√3=2√3. No, that can't be. Wait, no, the figure is a right triangle with angle 60°, leg √3, attached to a right triangle with angle 30°. So x=1, y=2, z=√3. Yes, that's correct: x=1, y=2, z=√3.